Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-35528501-20180609184833/@comment-35803416-20180610021250

((Note: This isn’t a hate comment but, just my opinion. Also, I haven’t read anyone else’s comments so if it sounds like I am copying someone please forgive me.))

I think banning “no correcting grammar” is confusing to me. Correcting grammar from a person’s story can help them improve in writing. Professional or not, everyone needs a bit of criticism. In fact, I’m trying to make a creepypasta myself. I want to make the story have nice grammar, good punctuation, at least trying not to have repetition, etc. If you can't accept grammar changes, you can ignore the critique.

When a story doesn't have the neatest grammar such as, ”dissapered”, ”planing”, ”usualy”, and other examples. It doesn't sound right and takes away a bit of the tension it builds up. ”I just saw someone correct stories, that is wrong because you do not own it and people have to rate them based on their quality.”

We don't own the story except for the author, you are correct. But people HAVE to rate them based on their quality? This rule sounds a bit ridiculous to me. Critiquing a story isn't a rule either but an option. Thanks for reading this if you do.