Board Thread:Wiki Administration and Management/@comment-33176737-20190108215415/@comment-34186110-20190109090857

Blue I just want to get to the meat of this debate we're having, right here right now.

I asked several question and I just want to know why things have to be this way.

Why only have community selected and apporved members? Why not the whole staff team? If your real intention is to "teaches users to think before they act", then wouldn't it be better to teach it to all your underlings in your staff team? Hell, you don't even choose the people YOU want to teach. What the hell kind of system is that?

"This debate team is to help people think and stand stronger". Why don't you want to share that with your other fellow staff members?

There's something you're not sharing with us here Blue. Like I see what you're trying to do. The debate team seems more like a hobby idea that people can come together and learn more about how to handle situations. And there's nothing wrong with that.

My problem is that only selected few staff members can only contriubate to this, AND it controls the wiki.

If this debate team is truly for teaching all of us to think better for ourselves, then why not have everyone invitied? You must teach all your staff members to think better for themselves. Don't you want to improve ALL of your staff memebers?

Or is there something I'm missing here Blue?