Board Thread:RCW Development Team/@comment-33719196-20181216174616/@comment-34186110-20181217232227

I'll be waiting around for about 2 hours, looking at this wikis logs.

The wiki is looking alright, will it die? No.

Will it be revived? Very unlikely.

For a wiki with 4K pages, but with such a low daliy user count, this is very poor. In my findings with working on other wikis, I noticed a pattern. The more you focus on maintaining a healthy community, the more likely the people will stay around. Thus increasing the qualility of life on the community and it's count.

This wiki did the total opposite of that, from what I can tell they did not have the community in mind at all. And before you say "We did votes and polls with the community." It take a lot more than getting a couple of users to come together to vote on a poll or if someone should be a admin.

And it's best if things weren't left to the power of the community because those users who are the loudest and toxic will shape what the community thinks, rather than what they think.

I read all the edit war history of this wiki and look to this current wiki's staff. From what I can see, the position of power was just given to people. To people who didn't work hard for it, or to people that wanted to abuse it's power, to people who could say "look at me, I'm a mod now!", to people who didn't care for the community.

And no, I'm not calling any of the current staff unworthy of their powers, or going to start demoting random people. This isn't my wiki so I don't understand the situations, so I'm trying to get myself educated on how this wiki thinks and acts.