Board Thread:Wiki Administration and Management/@comment-33176737-20190108215415/@comment-36249954-20190109140144

Look, blue, I'm sorry, but it Isn't just the amount of meetings that are the problem.

I understand how you feel. I've had stuff I worked hard on thrown down the drain, whether intentional or not. I hate the feeling.

I'll give reasons why I think the debate team should be dissolved, and you can argue against them, or not.

1. The debate team seems to give more power to certain people with the same rank.

Here's what I mean. Say, Johnny is an admin, and Joe is also an admin. But, Joe got voted onto the Debate Team, and Johnny didn't. Now, Joe has more of a say then Johnny because now he not only has a say on Super Important Issue, he has a say on whether or not Super Important Issue gets voted on at all. So now, essentially he has more power than Johnny, because he's on the Debate team. And, there's other things like has Joe caused wiki Disruption in the past and Johnny not? That kind of thing.

2. The Debate Team hasn't really done anything mind blowing.

As far as I can tell, the Deate Team hasn't really done anything Mind blowing. The last thing I can remember that the Debate Team did that had an affect on RCW was changing the background, and the RCW Pact. Nothing else.

3. The Debate team debating pattern

Well, what qualifies as a super important issue? I'd say Mandroid's attack does.

So why didn't you guys debate that?

I know that all the staff (including me) was out trying to revert Mandroid's vandalism, but seriously, couldn't the Debate Team at least make a small meeting to decided what to do? But it didn't. So now, we don't know what the Debate Team thinks is a Super Important Issue, because... Well, they didn't debate about Mandroid, when heck was goin down in 2018.