Thread:Mandroid543/@comment-25975337-20181027190135/@comment-24530269-20181028183115

I'm almost definitely getting myself in trouble with this, but I have to be honest here.

Being a wiki's "owner" (which in itself is objective false because FANDOM themselves owns all the domains, and they have stated that no individual user or group thereof can "own" a wiki) doesn't mean you have the right to do everything you want. Wikis are supposed to be a democracy, not an absolute autocracy. This dumb-down of the RtO is very much spiking down an opinion, a thing a user has the right to spread.

Fandom will not help you on this matter if you email them. Wikis are supposed to be democracies, not places where one individual user gets to decide literally everything whilst remaining in power themselves, without an option to be forced down. Again, I have to be honest here that there is no point in governing a wiki all on your own when you literally do next to nothing in it and are only active in monthly intervals.

In the end, the community is technically still the most powerful instrument. If the majority of the community wants a bureaucrat demoted, then it is settled. As a matter of fact, spiking down opinions and demotion polls counts as power abuse and makes it far more likely for FANDOM to just snatch your tools away right off the bat.

Overall, this context has to change. If this inactivity continues and the community wants someone else in power, then that is their fullest right and there's nothing any bureaucrat can do to disallow or prevent that. As a bureaucrat, you must be willing to accept criticism and community consensus.

Overall, I would like you to think about this. You're the "owner" of this wiki. And an "owner" does what is best for their wiki and its people, not what's best for themselves.