Board Thread:Polls/@comment-33719196-20181129233143/@comment-35439862-20181129234052

The main reasons for this final settling of the situation is due to the fact that we have agreed that wars are no longer "wars". We keep underlooking these simply petty rulebreaker situations and we pass them off as huge wars that means a loss could cost the wiki lots. It doesn't.

We don't need to look at rulebreakers as how we look at Benito Mussolini. The simple solution to these ""warmongers"" are to just block, ignore, revert edits and move on. Who cares if they come back with new accounts? This is FANDOM for goodness sakes - We can just block them again and again and report them if they do such a thing.

Don't freak out if someone vandalises a whole lot of pages and they evade their ban, it's so simple to block and ignore!

Again, I'm going to repeat this - A "pact" is absolutely useless (unless it has something to do with sharing staff members and helping eachother out with vandalism or spam) because we keep looking at rulebreakers and keep treating them like Benito Mussolini, when really, we shouldn't. In a wiki hosting platform, we just block and ignore - it's as simple as that. No repent trial, no debating, no freaking out, just block the offender and ignore. A single ADMIN should be able to decide that, but that's a topic for another day.

And if anyone doesn't get it, I Oppose the pact.