Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-35528501-20180609184833/@comment-35325088-20180609194040

KarlMarx69 wrote: I'm not arguing, but I would just like to answer the questions you posed in your post.

Q 1. How do you expect to correct thousands of story with grammar?

A 1. I don't. Just because it's impossible to correct every story doesn't mean it should be disallowed. That's like saying to a cop "There's no way you can catch all of the criminals, some will get away, so if you see a criminal you are not allowed to catch him". Even correcting the grammar of some articles will raise the net quality of the wiki, if just by a little bit.

Q 2. It appears like a waste of time

A 2. Well, I don't think it is a waste of time, but it's okay for you to think it is, just don't do it. There is no need to say that no one can do it just because you personally don't want to.

Q 3. It does not let users see its original quality.

A 3. I think that works of fiction should be judged by their quality as stories, not by superficial things like grammar. You may not know this but people who write professionally often have editors who correct any grammar mistakes they make.

Q 4. You can not really expect to go to a random page and do the same thing over and over again to correct because that would take too much time.

A 4. I do not expect anyone to do this, I would be completely happy even if I was the only one to ever correct grammar on this site. See A 2

The rest of your questions are just rewordings of the same point. Hit me up if you have any further questions. Again I will respect your decision for the time being, and I am just expressing my distaste. Thanks for listening. yes