Board Thread:Wiki News and Announcements/@comment-36249954-20190204023156/@comment-36249954-20190204195259

Tabuu5 wrote: I understand we have to keep quality standards on this wiki. All of them do, or else they'd all fall in to tatters. However, not every user is going to join the wiki if they look at it.

The reason I restored G0Z and oppose the Smile.exe deletion is that, well. Some users will find the wiki after looking for a popular pasta, and then possibly decide after checking out some other things, they might stick around. This increases our traffic and contributors. While I agree that there are better pastas then Smile and G0Z, I still oppose their deletion. If we keep getting rid of our more popular pastas that are known across the ROBLOX community, we may see less new contributors as time progresses. Yes, but, it wasn't supposed popular in the first place. It was deleted by staff, and that should have been that. It should never have been restored in the first place. I realize that these pastas are popular, and that they are symbols of our wiki, but we must apply the quality standards and basic rules to EVERY pasta. That includes G0z and Smile.exe.

My point is, this pasta did not meet standards then. In fact, it still doesn't. It broke rules, and got popular DESPITE the fact that it was supposed to have been deleted. In fact, it was deleted 3 TIMES OVER before I deleted it. Which would you rather have? A symbol of our wiki, or the reputation that we don't hold every pasta to the same standard? After all, it's unfair that Evita's (and everybody else's) pastas are held to the rules, but, pastas such as G0z and Smile.exe aren't just because they're well known, DESPITE the fact that compared to pastas like Pillar of Steel, it doesn't amount to Jack S**t.